TINJAUAN KOMPREHENSIF BERBAGAI TEKNOLOGI PENGOLAHAN AIR TERPRODUKSI PADA INDUSTRI MIGAS
Keywords:
Air Terproduksi, Adsorpsi, Teknologi Membran, Membran Bioreaktor, Elektrokoagulasi
Abstract
Air terproduksi (produced water, PW) merupakan limbah utama dari kegiatan industri minyak dan gas bumi yang mengandung berbagai senyawa organik, anorganik, logam berat, minyak dan lemak, serta zat kimia berbahaya. Kompleksitas komposisi PW menjadikannya salah satu limbah cair paling menantang untuk diolah sebelum dibuang atau dimanfaatkan kembali. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pemilihan dan pengembangan teknologi pengolahan yang tepat untuk menjamin kualitas lingkungan sekaligus mendukung prinsip keberlanjutan. Artikel ini menyajikan tinjauan komprehensif mengenai enam teknologi utama dalam pengolahan PW, yaitu adsorpsi, membran, elektrodialisis, membran bioreaktor, elektrokoagulasi, dan aktivasi elektrokimia. Adsorpsi menawarkan efisiensi tinggi dalam penghilangan kontaminan organik dengan biaya relatif rendah, namun terbatas oleh kapasitas material adsorben. Teknologi membran dan elektrodialisis mampu menghasilkan pemisahan ionik dan non-ionik secara selektif, meskipun tantangan fouling masih menjadi hambatan utama. Membran bioreaktor menggabungkan proses biologis dan pemisahan membran untuk degradasi bahan organik, dengan keunggulan efisiensi tinggi namun membutuhkan biaya operasional signifikan. Elektrokoagulasi telah terbukti efektif dalam menghilangkan minyak, logam, dan partikel tersuspensi dengan konsumsi bahan kimia minimal, sementara aktivasi elektrokimia menjanjikan disinfeksi dan peningkatan kualitas air melalui produksi agen oksidatif in situ. Dari kajian ini, jelas bahwa tidak ada satu teknologi tunggal yang mampu mengatasi seluruh kompleksitas PW. Oleh karena itu, pendekatan hibrid atau integratif yang mengombinasikan beberapa metode dipandang sebagai solusi yang lebih berkelanjutan untuk pengolahan PW secara efektif.
References
Amanda drane (2024) Wastewater is leaking from Texas oil wells. Here's why it's happening — and the dangers it poses. Houston Crhonicle : Business/Energy
Amin, N.; Aslam, M.; Yasin, M.; Hossain, S.; Shahid, M.K.; Inayat, A.; Samir, A.; Ahmad, R.; Murshed, M.N.; Khurram, M.S. Municipal Solid Waste Treatment for Bioenergy and Resource Production: Potential Technologies, Techno-Economic-Environmental Aspects and Implications of Membrane-Based Recovery. Chemosphere 2023, 323, 138196. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138196
Arthur, J.D.; Langhus, B.G.; Patel, C. Technical Summary of Oil & Gas Produced Water Treatment Technologies; All Consulting, LLC: Tulsa, OK, USA, 2005.
Aslam, M.; Ahmad, R.; Yasin, M.; Khan, A.L.; Shahid, M.K.; Hossain, S.; Khan, Z.; Jamil, F.; Rafiq, S.; Bilad, M.R.; et al. Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors for Biohydrogen Production: Recent Developments, Challenges and Perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 269, 452–464. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.050.
Asante-Sackey, D.; Rathilal, S.; Tetteh, E.K.; Armah, E.K. Membrane Bioreactors for Produced Water Treatment: A Mini-Review. Membranes 2022, 12, 275. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030275.
Azam, K.; Raza, R.; Shezad, N.; Shabir, M.; Yang, W.; Ahmad, N.; Shafiq, I.; Akhter, P.; Razzaq, A.; Hussain, M. Development of recoverable magnetic mesoporous carbon adsorbent for removal of methyl blue and methyl orange from wastewater. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104220. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104220.
Bolto, B.; Zhang, J.; Wu, X.; Xie, Z. A Review on Current Development of Membranes for Oil Removal from Wastewaters. Membranes 2020, 10, 65. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10040065.
Cilia Abdelhamid , Abdeldjalil Latrach , Minou Rabiei * and Kalyan Venugopal. (2025). Produced Water Treatment Technologies: A Review. MDPI Journal : Energies,18, 63. DOI:10.3390/en18010063.
Clark, C., et al. (2025). Produced Water Composition and Management Challenges. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/1007397.
Clark, C. E., et al. (2025). Risks of produced water management in U.S. onshore oil and gas. Environmental Health Perspectives, 133(2). PMC11966568.
Dallbauman, L.; Sirivedhin, T. Reclamation of Produced Water for Beneficial Use. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005, 40, 185–200. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-200041910.
Dickhout, J.M.; Moreno, J.; Biesheuvel, P.M.; Boels, L.; Lammertink, R.G.H.; de Vos, W.M. Produced Water Treatment by Membranes: A Review from a Colloidal Perspective. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 487, 523–534. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.013 .
Drewes, J.; Cath, T.; Xu, P.; Graydon, J. An Integrated Framework for Treatment and Management of Produced Water: Technical Assessment of Produced Water Treatment Technologies; Colorado School of Mines: Golden, CO, USA, 2009; pp. 1–157.
Eddy, M.; Abu-Orf, M.; Bowden, G.; Burton, F.L.; Pfrang, W.; Stensel, H.D.; Tchobanoglous, G.; Tsuchihashi, R.; Firm, A. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery; McGraw Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2014; ISBN 1259010791.
Ezechi, E.H.; Isa, M.H.; Muda, K.; Kutty, S.R.M. A comparative evaluation of two electrode systems on continuous electrocoagulation of boron from produced water and mass transfer resistance. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 34, 101133. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101133.
Faisal, D.P.I; Muhammad; Rizka, M.; Rizka, N.; Syamsul, B. Adsorben karbon aktif dari kulit tanduk kopi (endocarp) diaplikasikan pada zat warna Methylene blue. 2025. Chemical Engineering Journal Storage 5:3 (Juni 2025) 359-371. DOI : https://doi.org/10.29103/cejs.v5i3.17297.
Fakhru’l-Razi, A.; Pendashteh, A.; Abidin, Z.Z.; Abdullah, L.C.; Biak, D.R.A.; Madaeni, S.S. Application of Membrane-Coupled Sequencing Batch Reactor for Oilfield Produced Water Recycle and Beneficial Re-Use. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 6942–6949. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.005.
Fakhraee, M.; Akhavan, O. Ultrahigh Permeable C2N-Inspired Graphene Nanomesh Membranes versus Highly Strained C2N for Reverse Osmosis Desalination. J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123, 8740–8752. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b07015.
Fatick Nath, Mohammed Omar Sahed Chowdhury, Md. Masudur Rhaman, Navigating Produced Water Sustainability in the Oil and Gas Sector: A Critical Review of Reuse Challenges, Treatment Technologies, and Prospects Ahead. MDPI Journal= Water 2023, 15(23), 4088; DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/w15234088.
Frank, V.B.; Regnery, J.; Chan, K.E.; Ramey, D.F.; Spear, J.R.; Cath, T.Y. Co-Treatment of Residential and Oil and Gas Production Wastewater with a Hybrid Sequencing Batch Reactor-Membrane Bioreactor Process. J. Water Process Eng. 2017, 17, 82–94. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.03.003.
Fulazzaky, M.; Setiadi, T.; Fulazzaky, M.A. An Evaluation of the Oilfield-Produced Water Treatment by the Membrane Bioreactor. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104417. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104417.
Genesis Water Tech (2019). Electrocoagulation Provides Economical Solution for Produced Water to Oil & Gas Companies. https://genesiswatertech.com/blog-post/electrocoagulation-provides-an-economical-produced-water-solution-to-oil-gas-companies/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
Gholami, M.; Abbasi Souraki, B.; Pendashteh, A. Electro-activated persulfate oxidation (EC/PS) for the treatment of real oilfield produced water: Optimization, developed numerical kinetic model, and comparison with thermal/EC/PS and EC systems. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2021, 153, 384–402. DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2021.07.011.
Houston Chronicle. (2024). Oil waste water leaks contamination earthquakes.
Ibrahim, M.H.; Moussa, D.T.; El-Naas, M.H.; Nasser, M.S. A perforated electrode design for passivation reduction during the electrochemical treatment of produced water. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 33, 101091. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101091.
Ignatov, I.; Gluhchev, G.; Karadzhov, S.; Miloshev, G.; Ivanov, N.; Mosin, O. Preparation of Electrochemically Activated Water Solutions (Catholyte/Anolyte) and Studying Their Physical-Chemical Properties. J. Med. Physiol. Biophys. 2015, 11, 1–21. https://www.medicalbiophysics.bg/en/20405.html.
Khorram, A.G.; Fallah, N.; Nasernejad, B.; Afsham, N.; Esmaelzadeh, M.; Vatanpour, V. Electrochemical-based processes for produced water and oily wastewater treatment: A review. Chemosphere 2023, 338, 139565. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139565.
Khajouei, G.; Park, H.I.; Finklea, H.O.; Ziemkiewicz, P.F.; Peltier, E.F.; Lin, L.S. Produced water softening using high-pH catholyte from brine electrolysis: Reducing chemical transportation and environmental footprints. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 40, 101911. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101911.
Khor, C.M.; Wang, J.; Li, M.; Oettel, B.A.; Kaner, R.B.; Jassby, D.; Hoek, E.M.V. Performance, energy and cost of produced water treatment by chemical and electrochemical coagulation. Water 2020, 12, 3426. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123426.
Liu, Y.; Lu, H.; Li, Y.; Xu, H.; Pan, Z.; Dai, P.; Wang, H.; Yang, Q. A review of treatment technologies for produced water in offshore oil and gas fields. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 775, 145485. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145485.
Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Lu, H.; Pan, Z.; Dai, P.; Sun, G.; Yang, Q. A full-scale process for produced water treatment on offshore oilfield: Reduction of organic pollutants dominated by hydrocarbons. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 296, 126511. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126511.
Madhavan, M.A.; Antony, S.P. Effect of polarity shift on the performance of electrocoagulation process for the treatment of produced water. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 128052. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128052.
M.said, David B, Rizza Fadillah Fitri (2021). Treatment of Produce Water with a Combination of Electrocoagulation with Iron (Fe) Electrodes and Adsorption Using Silica and Activated Carbon. International Journal on Advanced science Engineering Information Technology. Vol. 11 No 1. DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.11.1.12490.
Mehri, M.; Fallah, N.; Nasernejad, B. Mechanisms of heavy metal and oil removal from synthetic saline oilfield produced water by electrocoagulation. npj Clean Water 2021, 4, 45. DOI:10.1038/s41545-021-00135-0.
Melin, T.; Jefferson, B.; Bixio, D.; Thoeye, C.; De Wilde, W.; De Koning, J.; van der Graaf, J.; Wintgens, T. Membrane Bioreactor Technology for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse. Desalination 2006, 187, 271–282. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.086.
Mutamim, N.S.A.; Noor, Z.Z.; Hassan, M.A.A.; Olsson, G. Application of Membrane Bioreactor Technology in Treating High Strength Industrial Wastewater: A Performance Review. Desalination 2012, 305, 1–11. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.033.
Neff, J., Lee, K., & DeBlois, E. (2021). Produced Water: Overview of International Discharge Standards. Marine Pollution Bulletin.
Nidheesh, P.V.; Scaria, J.; Babu, D.S.; Kumar, M.S. An overview on combined electrocoagulation-degradation processes for the effective treatment of water and wastewater. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 127907. • DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127907 .
Nguyen, L.N.; Truong, M.V.; Nguyen, A.Q.; Johir, M.A.H.; Commault, A.S.; Ralph, P.J.; Semblante, G.U.; Nghiem, L.D. A Sequential Membrane Bioreactor Followed by a Membrane Microalgal Reactor for Nutrient Removal and Algal Biomass Production. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2020, 6, 189–196. DOI: 10.1039/C9EW00851A.
Olajire, A.A. Recent Advances on the Treatment Technology of Oil and Gas Produced Water for Sustainable Energy Industry-Mechanistic Aspects and Process Chemistry Perspectives. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2020, 4, 100049. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2020.100049.
Pendashteh, A.R.; Abdullah, L.C.; Fakhru’l-Razi, A.; Madaeni, S.S.; Abidin, Z.Z.; Biak, D.R.A. Evaluation of Membrane Bioreactor for Hypersaline Oily Wastewater Treatment. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2012, 90, 45–55. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2011.07.006.
Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Nomor 19 Tahun 2010 tentang Baku Mutu Air Limbah Kegiatan Minyak dan Gas.
Rahighi, R.; Hosseini-Hosseinabad, S.M.; Zeraati, A.S.; Suwaileh, W.; Norouzi, A.; Panahi, M.; Gholipour, S.; Karaman, C.; Akhavan, O.; Khollari, M.A.R.; et al. Two-Dimensional Materials in Enhancement of Membrane-Based Lithium Recovery from Metallic-Ions-Rich Wastewaters: A Review. Desalination 2022, 543, 116096. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2022.116096.
Rahman, M., et al. (2022). Electrocoagulation Treatment of Produced Water: A Review. Journal of Water Process Engineering.
RSC. (2023). Environmental Impact of Produced Water Discharges. Royal Society of Chemistry Review.
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC). (2023). Opportunities for reuse of produced water in Permian Basin.
Salas, B.V.; Wiener, M.S. Desalination, Trends and Technologies. Desalin. Water Treat. 2012, 42, 347–348.
S&P Global Commodity Insights. (2024). Water handling and emissions in shale maturity.
S&P Global. (2024). Produced Water Treatment Market Outlook.
Shah, M.T.; Parmar, H.B.; Rhyne, L.D.; Kalli, C.; Utikar, R.P.; Pareek, V.K. A novel settling tank for produced water treatment: CFD simulations and PIV experiments. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 182, 106352. DOI : 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106352.
Shahid, M.K.; Kashif, A.; Rout, P.R.; Aslam, M.; Fuwad, A.; Choi, Y.; Park, J.H.; Kumar, G. A Brief Review of Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors Emphasizing Recent Advancements, Fouling Issues and Future Perspectives. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 270, 110909. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110909.
Shahid, M.K.; Mainali, B.; Rout, P.R.; Lim, J.W.; Aslam, M.; Al-Rawajfeh, A.E.; Choi, Y. A Review of Membrane-Based Desalination Systems Powered by Renewable Energy Sources. Water 2023, 15, 534. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030534.
Siagian, U.W.R.; Widodo, S.; Wardani, A.K.; Wenten, I.G. Oilfield Produced Water Reuse and Reinjection with Membrane. In Proceedings of the MATEC Web of Conferences, Semarang, Indonesia, 15–16 November 2017; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2018; Volume 156, p. 8005. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815608005.
Siti, W.S.; Lukman, H; Meriatna; Wiza, U.F.; Azhari. Pengolahan air payau (brackish water) menjadi air Bersih dengan metode elektrokoagulasi menggunakan Panel surya (photooltaic). 2025. Chemical Engineering Journal Storage 5:3 (Juni 2025) 346-358. DOI : https://doi.org/10.29103/cejs.v5i3.15349.
Sharghi, E.A.; Bonakdarpour, B.; Pakzadeh, M. Treatment of Hypersaline Produced Water Employing a Moderately Halophilic Bacterial Consortium in a Membrane Bioreactor: Effect of Salt Concentration on Organic Removal Performance, Mixed Liquor Characteristics and Membrane Fouling. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 164, 203–213. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.099
Sharghi, E.A.; Bonakdarpour, B.; Roustazade, P.; Amoozegar, M.A.; Rabbani, A.R. The Biological Treatment of High Salinity Synthetic Oilfield Produced Water in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor Using a Halophilic Bacterial Consortium. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2013, 88, 2016–2026. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4061.
Sirivedhin, T.; McCue, J.; Dallbauman, L. Reclaiming Produced Water for Beneficial Use: Salt Removal by Electrodialysis. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 243, 335–343. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.038.
Stella I. Eyitayo, Marshall C. Watson, Oladoyin Kolawole, Pei Xu, Kazeem A. Lawal, Marshal E. Wigwe and Alberto Giussani. (2023). Novel systematic approach for produced water volume quantification applicable for beneficial reuse. Royal Society of Chemistry Journal. DOI: 10.1039/D2VA00282E (Paper) Environ. Sci.: Adv., 2023, 2, 508-528.
Sundt, Rolf C.; Baussant, Thierry; Beyer, Jonny (2009-01-01). "Uptake and tissue distribution of C4–C7 alkylphenols in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua): Relevance for biomonitoring of produced water discharges from oil production". Marine Pollution Bulletin. 58 (1): 72–79. Bibcode:2009MarPB..58...72S. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.09.012. ISSN 0025-326X. PMID 18945454.
Tamunokuro, K.; Ramirez, A.; Molinari, M. Review of Oilfield Produced Water Treatment Technologies. Chemosphere 2022, 298, 134064.
Tetteh, E.K.; Rathilal, S.; Asante-Sackey, D.; Chollom, M.N. Prospects of Synthesized Magnetic TiO2-Based Membranes for Wastewater Treatment: A Review. Materials 2021, 14, 3524. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14133524.
Veil, J. (2020). International Standards for Produced Water Management. SPE Journal.
Wall Street Journal. (2023). In America’s biggest oil field, the ground is swelling and buckling.
Wikipedia. (2025). Health and environmental impact of the petroleum industry.
Wu, M.; Chen, Y.; Lin, H.; Zhao, L.; Shen, L.; Li, R.; Xu, Y.; Hong, H.; He, Y. Membrane Fouling Caused by Biological Foams in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor: Mechanism Insights. Water Res. 2020, 181, 115932. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115932
Amin, N.; Aslam, M.; Yasin, M.; Hossain, S.; Shahid, M.K.; Inayat, A.; Samir, A.; Ahmad, R.; Murshed, M.N.; Khurram, M.S. Municipal Solid Waste Treatment for Bioenergy and Resource Production: Potential Technologies, Techno-Economic-Environmental Aspects and Implications of Membrane-Based Recovery. Chemosphere 2023, 323, 138196. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138196
Arthur, J.D.; Langhus, B.G.; Patel, C. Technical Summary of Oil & Gas Produced Water Treatment Technologies; All Consulting, LLC: Tulsa, OK, USA, 2005.
Aslam, M.; Ahmad, R.; Yasin, M.; Khan, A.L.; Shahid, M.K.; Hossain, S.; Khan, Z.; Jamil, F.; Rafiq, S.; Bilad, M.R.; et al. Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors for Biohydrogen Production: Recent Developments, Challenges and Perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 269, 452–464. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.050.
Asante-Sackey, D.; Rathilal, S.; Tetteh, E.K.; Armah, E.K. Membrane Bioreactors for Produced Water Treatment: A Mini-Review. Membranes 2022, 12, 275. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030275.
Azam, K.; Raza, R.; Shezad, N.; Shabir, M.; Yang, W.; Ahmad, N.; Shafiq, I.; Akhter, P.; Razzaq, A.; Hussain, M. Development of recoverable magnetic mesoporous carbon adsorbent for removal of methyl blue and methyl orange from wastewater. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104220. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104220.
Bolto, B.; Zhang, J.; Wu, X.; Xie, Z. A Review on Current Development of Membranes for Oil Removal from Wastewaters. Membranes 2020, 10, 65. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10040065.
Cilia Abdelhamid , Abdeldjalil Latrach , Minou Rabiei * and Kalyan Venugopal. (2025). Produced Water Treatment Technologies: A Review. MDPI Journal : Energies,18, 63. DOI:10.3390/en18010063.
Clark, C., et al. (2025). Produced Water Composition and Management Challenges. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/1007397.
Clark, C. E., et al. (2025). Risks of produced water management in U.S. onshore oil and gas. Environmental Health Perspectives, 133(2). PMC11966568.
Dallbauman, L.; Sirivedhin, T. Reclamation of Produced Water for Beneficial Use. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005, 40, 185–200. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-200041910.
Dickhout, J.M.; Moreno, J.; Biesheuvel, P.M.; Boels, L.; Lammertink, R.G.H.; de Vos, W.M. Produced Water Treatment by Membranes: A Review from a Colloidal Perspective. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 487, 523–534. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.013 .
Drewes, J.; Cath, T.; Xu, P.; Graydon, J. An Integrated Framework for Treatment and Management of Produced Water: Technical Assessment of Produced Water Treatment Technologies; Colorado School of Mines: Golden, CO, USA, 2009; pp. 1–157.
Eddy, M.; Abu-Orf, M.; Bowden, G.; Burton, F.L.; Pfrang, W.; Stensel, H.D.; Tchobanoglous, G.; Tsuchihashi, R.; Firm, A. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery; McGraw Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2014; ISBN 1259010791.
Ezechi, E.H.; Isa, M.H.; Muda, K.; Kutty, S.R.M. A comparative evaluation of two electrode systems on continuous electrocoagulation of boron from produced water and mass transfer resistance. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 34, 101133. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101133.
Faisal, D.P.I; Muhammad; Rizka, M.; Rizka, N.; Syamsul, B. Adsorben karbon aktif dari kulit tanduk kopi (endocarp) diaplikasikan pada zat warna Methylene blue. 2025. Chemical Engineering Journal Storage 5:3 (Juni 2025) 359-371. DOI : https://doi.org/10.29103/cejs.v5i3.17297.
Fakhru’l-Razi, A.; Pendashteh, A.; Abidin, Z.Z.; Abdullah, L.C.; Biak, D.R.A.; Madaeni, S.S. Application of Membrane-Coupled Sequencing Batch Reactor for Oilfield Produced Water Recycle and Beneficial Re-Use. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 6942–6949. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.005.
Fakhraee, M.; Akhavan, O. Ultrahigh Permeable C2N-Inspired Graphene Nanomesh Membranes versus Highly Strained C2N for Reverse Osmosis Desalination. J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123, 8740–8752. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b07015.
Fatick Nath, Mohammed Omar Sahed Chowdhury, Md. Masudur Rhaman, Navigating Produced Water Sustainability in the Oil and Gas Sector: A Critical Review of Reuse Challenges, Treatment Technologies, and Prospects Ahead. MDPI Journal= Water 2023, 15(23), 4088; DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/w15234088.
Frank, V.B.; Regnery, J.; Chan, K.E.; Ramey, D.F.; Spear, J.R.; Cath, T.Y. Co-Treatment of Residential and Oil and Gas Production Wastewater with a Hybrid Sequencing Batch Reactor-Membrane Bioreactor Process. J. Water Process Eng. 2017, 17, 82–94. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.03.003.
Fulazzaky, M.; Setiadi, T.; Fulazzaky, M.A. An Evaluation of the Oilfield-Produced Water Treatment by the Membrane Bioreactor. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104417. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104417.
Genesis Water Tech (2019). Electrocoagulation Provides Economical Solution for Produced Water to Oil & Gas Companies. https://genesiswatertech.com/blog-post/electrocoagulation-provides-an-economical-produced-water-solution-to-oil-gas-companies/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
Gholami, M.; Abbasi Souraki, B.; Pendashteh, A. Electro-activated persulfate oxidation (EC/PS) for the treatment of real oilfield produced water: Optimization, developed numerical kinetic model, and comparison with thermal/EC/PS and EC systems. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2021, 153, 384–402. DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2021.07.011.
Houston Chronicle. (2024). Oil waste water leaks contamination earthquakes.
Ibrahim, M.H.; Moussa, D.T.; El-Naas, M.H.; Nasser, M.S. A perforated electrode design for passivation reduction during the electrochemical treatment of produced water. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 33, 101091. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101091.
Ignatov, I.; Gluhchev, G.; Karadzhov, S.; Miloshev, G.; Ivanov, N.; Mosin, O. Preparation of Electrochemically Activated Water Solutions (Catholyte/Anolyte) and Studying Their Physical-Chemical Properties. J. Med. Physiol. Biophys. 2015, 11, 1–21. https://www.medicalbiophysics.bg/en/20405.html.
Khorram, A.G.; Fallah, N.; Nasernejad, B.; Afsham, N.; Esmaelzadeh, M.; Vatanpour, V. Electrochemical-based processes for produced water and oily wastewater treatment: A review. Chemosphere 2023, 338, 139565. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139565.
Khajouei, G.; Park, H.I.; Finklea, H.O.; Ziemkiewicz, P.F.; Peltier, E.F.; Lin, L.S. Produced water softening using high-pH catholyte from brine electrolysis: Reducing chemical transportation and environmental footprints. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 40, 101911. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101911.
Khor, C.M.; Wang, J.; Li, M.; Oettel, B.A.; Kaner, R.B.; Jassby, D.; Hoek, E.M.V. Performance, energy and cost of produced water treatment by chemical and electrochemical coagulation. Water 2020, 12, 3426. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123426.
Liu, Y.; Lu, H.; Li, Y.; Xu, H.; Pan, Z.; Dai, P.; Wang, H.; Yang, Q. A review of treatment technologies for produced water in offshore oil and gas fields. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 775, 145485. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145485.
Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Lu, H.; Pan, Z.; Dai, P.; Sun, G.; Yang, Q. A full-scale process for produced water treatment on offshore oilfield: Reduction of organic pollutants dominated by hydrocarbons. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 296, 126511. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126511.
Madhavan, M.A.; Antony, S.P. Effect of polarity shift on the performance of electrocoagulation process for the treatment of produced water. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 128052. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128052.
M.said, David B, Rizza Fadillah Fitri (2021). Treatment of Produce Water with a Combination of Electrocoagulation with Iron (Fe) Electrodes and Adsorption Using Silica and Activated Carbon. International Journal on Advanced science Engineering Information Technology. Vol. 11 No 1. DOI : https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.11.1.12490.
Mehri, M.; Fallah, N.; Nasernejad, B. Mechanisms of heavy metal and oil removal from synthetic saline oilfield produced water by electrocoagulation. npj Clean Water 2021, 4, 45. DOI:10.1038/s41545-021-00135-0.
Melin, T.; Jefferson, B.; Bixio, D.; Thoeye, C.; De Wilde, W.; De Koning, J.; van der Graaf, J.; Wintgens, T. Membrane Bioreactor Technology for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse. Desalination 2006, 187, 271–282. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.086.
Mutamim, N.S.A.; Noor, Z.Z.; Hassan, M.A.A.; Olsson, G. Application of Membrane Bioreactor Technology in Treating High Strength Industrial Wastewater: A Performance Review. Desalination 2012, 305, 1–11. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.033.
Neff, J., Lee, K., & DeBlois, E. (2021). Produced Water: Overview of International Discharge Standards. Marine Pollution Bulletin.
Nidheesh, P.V.; Scaria, J.; Babu, D.S.; Kumar, M.S. An overview on combined electrocoagulation-degradation processes for the effective treatment of water and wastewater. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 127907. • DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127907 .
Nguyen, L.N.; Truong, M.V.; Nguyen, A.Q.; Johir, M.A.H.; Commault, A.S.; Ralph, P.J.; Semblante, G.U.; Nghiem, L.D. A Sequential Membrane Bioreactor Followed by a Membrane Microalgal Reactor for Nutrient Removal and Algal Biomass Production. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2020, 6, 189–196. DOI: 10.1039/C9EW00851A.
Olajire, A.A. Recent Advances on the Treatment Technology of Oil and Gas Produced Water for Sustainable Energy Industry-Mechanistic Aspects and Process Chemistry Perspectives. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2020, 4, 100049. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2020.100049.
Pendashteh, A.R.; Abdullah, L.C.; Fakhru’l-Razi, A.; Madaeni, S.S.; Abidin, Z.Z.; Biak, D.R.A. Evaluation of Membrane Bioreactor for Hypersaline Oily Wastewater Treatment. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2012, 90, 45–55. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2011.07.006.
Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Nomor 19 Tahun 2010 tentang Baku Mutu Air Limbah Kegiatan Minyak dan Gas.
Rahighi, R.; Hosseini-Hosseinabad, S.M.; Zeraati, A.S.; Suwaileh, W.; Norouzi, A.; Panahi, M.; Gholipour, S.; Karaman, C.; Akhavan, O.; Khollari, M.A.R.; et al. Two-Dimensional Materials in Enhancement of Membrane-Based Lithium Recovery from Metallic-Ions-Rich Wastewaters: A Review. Desalination 2022, 543, 116096. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2022.116096.
Rahman, M., et al. (2022). Electrocoagulation Treatment of Produced Water: A Review. Journal of Water Process Engineering.
RSC. (2023). Environmental Impact of Produced Water Discharges. Royal Society of Chemistry Review.
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC). (2023). Opportunities for reuse of produced water in Permian Basin.
Salas, B.V.; Wiener, M.S. Desalination, Trends and Technologies. Desalin. Water Treat. 2012, 42, 347–348.
S&P Global Commodity Insights. (2024). Water handling and emissions in shale maturity.
S&P Global. (2024). Produced Water Treatment Market Outlook.
Shah, M.T.; Parmar, H.B.; Rhyne, L.D.; Kalli, C.; Utikar, R.P.; Pareek, V.K. A novel settling tank for produced water treatment: CFD simulations and PIV experiments. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 182, 106352. DOI : 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106352.
Shahid, M.K.; Kashif, A.; Rout, P.R.; Aslam, M.; Fuwad, A.; Choi, Y.; Park, J.H.; Kumar, G. A Brief Review of Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors Emphasizing Recent Advancements, Fouling Issues and Future Perspectives. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 270, 110909. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110909.
Shahid, M.K.; Mainali, B.; Rout, P.R.; Lim, J.W.; Aslam, M.; Al-Rawajfeh, A.E.; Choi, Y. A Review of Membrane-Based Desalination Systems Powered by Renewable Energy Sources. Water 2023, 15, 534. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030534.
Siagian, U.W.R.; Widodo, S.; Wardani, A.K.; Wenten, I.G. Oilfield Produced Water Reuse and Reinjection with Membrane. In Proceedings of the MATEC Web of Conferences, Semarang, Indonesia, 15–16 November 2017; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2018; Volume 156, p. 8005. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815608005.
Siti, W.S.; Lukman, H; Meriatna; Wiza, U.F.; Azhari. Pengolahan air payau (brackish water) menjadi air Bersih dengan metode elektrokoagulasi menggunakan Panel surya (photooltaic). 2025. Chemical Engineering Journal Storage 5:3 (Juni 2025) 346-358. DOI : https://doi.org/10.29103/cejs.v5i3.15349.
Sharghi, E.A.; Bonakdarpour, B.; Pakzadeh, M. Treatment of Hypersaline Produced Water Employing a Moderately Halophilic Bacterial Consortium in a Membrane Bioreactor: Effect of Salt Concentration on Organic Removal Performance, Mixed Liquor Characteristics and Membrane Fouling. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 164, 203–213. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.099
Sharghi, E.A.; Bonakdarpour, B.; Roustazade, P.; Amoozegar, M.A.; Rabbani, A.R. The Biological Treatment of High Salinity Synthetic Oilfield Produced Water in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor Using a Halophilic Bacterial Consortium. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2013, 88, 2016–2026. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4061.
Sirivedhin, T.; McCue, J.; Dallbauman, L. Reclaiming Produced Water for Beneficial Use: Salt Removal by Electrodialysis. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 243, 335–343. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.038.
Stella I. Eyitayo, Marshall C. Watson, Oladoyin Kolawole, Pei Xu, Kazeem A. Lawal, Marshal E. Wigwe and Alberto Giussani. (2023). Novel systematic approach for produced water volume quantification applicable for beneficial reuse. Royal Society of Chemistry Journal. DOI: 10.1039/D2VA00282E (Paper) Environ. Sci.: Adv., 2023, 2, 508-528.
Sundt, Rolf C.; Baussant, Thierry; Beyer, Jonny (2009-01-01). "Uptake and tissue distribution of C4–C7 alkylphenols in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua): Relevance for biomonitoring of produced water discharges from oil production". Marine Pollution Bulletin. 58 (1): 72–79. Bibcode:2009MarPB..58...72S. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.09.012. ISSN 0025-326X. PMID 18945454.
Tamunokuro, K.; Ramirez, A.; Molinari, M. Review of Oilfield Produced Water Treatment Technologies. Chemosphere 2022, 298, 134064.
Tetteh, E.K.; Rathilal, S.; Asante-Sackey, D.; Chollom, M.N. Prospects of Synthesized Magnetic TiO2-Based Membranes for Wastewater Treatment: A Review. Materials 2021, 14, 3524. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14133524.
Veil, J. (2020). International Standards for Produced Water Management. SPE Journal.
Wall Street Journal. (2023). In America’s biggest oil field, the ground is swelling and buckling.
Wikipedia. (2025). Health and environmental impact of the petroleum industry.
Wu, M.; Chen, Y.; Lin, H.; Zhao, L.; Shen, L.; Li, R.; Xu, Y.; Hong, H.; He, Y. Membrane Fouling Caused by Biological Foams in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor: Mechanism Insights. Water Res. 2020, 181, 115932. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115932
Published
2025-12-26
How to Cite
Rizza Fadillah Fitri. (2025). TINJAUAN KOMPREHENSIF BERBAGAI TEKNOLOGI PENGOLAHAN AIR TERPRODUKSI PADA INDUSTRI MIGAS. Journal of Scientech Research and Development, 7(2), 191-218. https://doi.org/10.56670/jsrd.v7i2.1217
Section
Articles
