PENGARUH KEMANFAATAN DAN KEMUDAHAN PENGGUNAAN TERHADAP PENERIMAAN SISTEM INFORMASI: BUKTI PADA SISTEM SAKTI
Keywords:
Penerimaan SAKTI, TAM, PLS-SEM, Kemanfaatan, Kemudahan Penggunaan
Abstract
Penelitian ini menganalisis pengaruh kemanfaatan dan kemudahan penggunaan terhadap penerimaan sistem SAKTI dengan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) yang dimodifikasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode survei dengan mengambil sampel dari pengguna SAKTI di lingkup Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya. Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) untuk menguji pengaruh kemanfaatan dan kemudahan penggunaan terhadap penerimaan sistem. Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan semakin baik kemudahan dan kemanfaatan penggunaan akan meningkatkan penerimaan sistem SAKTI. Penelitian ini digunakan sebagai konfirmasi atas teori dan model TAM yang telah dimodifikasi. Penelitian ini juga memberikan gambaran terkait persepsi kemanfaatan dan kemudahan penggunaan sistem SAKTI.
References
Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021). Measuring Students’ Use of Zoom Application in Language Course Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1
Al-Gahtani, S. (2001). The Applicability of TAM Outside North America: An Empirical Test in the United Kingdom. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 14(3). https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2001070104
Al-Gahtani, S. S., & King, M. (1999). Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/014492999119020
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Diamond, J., & Khemani, P. (2021). Introducing Financial Management Information Systems in Developing Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.888065
Dwivedi, Y. K., Wastell, D., Laumer, S., Henriksen, H. Z., Myers, M. D., Bunker, D., Elbanna, A., Ravishankar, M. N., & Srivastava, S. C. (2015). Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9500-y
Godoe, P., & Stillaug Johansen, T. (2012). Understanding adoption of new technologies. Journal of European Psychology Students, 3.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. In European Business Review (Vol. 31, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Irawati, T., Rimawati, E., & Pramesti, N. A. (2020). Penggunaan Metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Dalam Analisis Sistem Informasi Alista (Application Of Logistic And Supply Telkom Akses). Is The Best Accounting Information Systems and Information Technology Business Enterprise This Is Link for OJS Us, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.34010/aisthebest.v4i02.2257
Joseph F Hair, G. Thomas M. Hult, Christian M. RIngle, & Marko Sarstedt. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage.
Kwong-Kay Wong, K. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1).
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01250
Liao, C.-H., Tsou, C.-W., & Shu, Y.-C. (2008). The Roles of Perceived Enjoyment and Price Perception in Determining Acceptance of Multimedia-on-Demand. International Journal of Business and Information, 3(1).
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
Natalia Tangke. (2004). ANALISA PENERIMAAN PENERAPAN TEKNIK AUDIT BERBANTUAN KOMPUTER (TABK) DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) PADA BADAN PEMERIKSA KEUANGAN (BPK) RI. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(1).
Natasia, S. R., Wiranti, Y. T., & Parastika, A. (2021). Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach. Procedia Computer Science, 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.168
Petter, S., Delone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2013). Information systems success: The quest for the independent variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290401
Prabowo, N. T. (2017). Analisis Sistem Aplikasi Keuangan Tingkat Instansi (SAKTI) dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model. Indonesian Treasury Review Jurnal Perbendaharaan Keuangan Negara Dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v2i2.27
Prof. Dr. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif Serta R&D. In Alfabeta, CV (Issue April).
Putri, G. A., Widagdo, A. K., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Analysis of financial technology acceptance of peer to peer lending (P2P lending) using extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100027
Sayekti, F., & Putarta, P. (2016). Penerapan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Dalam Pengujian Model Penerimaan Sistem Informasi Keuangan Daerah. Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan| Journal of Theory and Applied Management, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.20473/jmtt.v9i3.3075
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers and Education, 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, Roger. (2016). Research methods for business : a skill-building approach / Uma Sekaran and Roger Bougie. In Nucleic Acids Research.
Selamat, Z., & Jaffar, N. (2010). Information Technology Acceptance: From Perspective of Malaysian Bankers. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n1p207
Sørebø, Ø., & Eikebrokk, T. R. (2008). Explaining IS continuance in environments where usage is mandatory. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.011
Sukendro, S., Habibi, A., Khaeruddin, K., Indrayana, B., Syahruddin, S., Makadada, F. A., & Hakim, H. (2020). Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education context. Heliyon, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410
Surachman Arif. (2008). Analisis Penerimaan Sistem Informasi Perpustakaan (Sipus) Terpadu Versi 3 Di Lingkungan Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM). Perpustakaan Digital UIN Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 1(2).
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Al-Gahtani, S. (2001). The Applicability of TAM Outside North America: An Empirical Test in the United Kingdom. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 14(3). https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2001070104
Al-Gahtani, S. S., & King, M. (1999). Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/014492999119020
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Diamond, J., & Khemani, P. (2021). Introducing Financial Management Information Systems in Developing Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.888065
Dwivedi, Y. K., Wastell, D., Laumer, S., Henriksen, H. Z., Myers, M. D., Bunker, D., Elbanna, A., Ravishankar, M. N., & Srivastava, S. C. (2015). Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9500-y
Godoe, P., & Stillaug Johansen, T. (2012). Understanding adoption of new technologies. Journal of European Psychology Students, 3.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. In European Business Review (Vol. 31, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Irawati, T., Rimawati, E., & Pramesti, N. A. (2020). Penggunaan Metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Dalam Analisis Sistem Informasi Alista (Application Of Logistic And Supply Telkom Akses). Is The Best Accounting Information Systems and Information Technology Business Enterprise This Is Link for OJS Us, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.34010/aisthebest.v4i02.2257
Joseph F Hair, G. Thomas M. Hult, Christian M. RIngle, & Marko Sarstedt. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage.
Kwong-Kay Wong, K. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1).
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01250
Liao, C.-H., Tsou, C.-W., & Shu, Y.-C. (2008). The Roles of Perceived Enjoyment and Price Perception in Determining Acceptance of Multimedia-on-Demand. International Journal of Business and Information, 3(1).
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
Natalia Tangke. (2004). ANALISA PENERIMAAN PENERAPAN TEKNIK AUDIT BERBANTUAN KOMPUTER (TABK) DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) PADA BADAN PEMERIKSA KEUANGAN (BPK) RI. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(1).
Natasia, S. R., Wiranti, Y. T., & Parastika, A. (2021). Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach. Procedia Computer Science, 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.168
Petter, S., Delone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2013). Information systems success: The quest for the independent variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290401
Prabowo, N. T. (2017). Analisis Sistem Aplikasi Keuangan Tingkat Instansi (SAKTI) dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model. Indonesian Treasury Review Jurnal Perbendaharaan Keuangan Negara Dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v2i2.27
Prof. Dr. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif Serta R&D. In Alfabeta, CV (Issue April).
Putri, G. A., Widagdo, A. K., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Analysis of financial technology acceptance of peer to peer lending (P2P lending) using extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100027
Sayekti, F., & Putarta, P. (2016). Penerapan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Dalam Pengujian Model Penerimaan Sistem Informasi Keuangan Daerah. Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan| Journal of Theory and Applied Management, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.20473/jmtt.v9i3.3075
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers and Education, 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, Roger. (2016). Research methods for business : a skill-building approach / Uma Sekaran and Roger Bougie. In Nucleic Acids Research.
Selamat, Z., & Jaffar, N. (2010). Information Technology Acceptance: From Perspective of Malaysian Bankers. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n1p207
Sørebø, Ø., & Eikebrokk, T. R. (2008). Explaining IS continuance in environments where usage is mandatory. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.011
Sukendro, S., Habibi, A., Khaeruddin, K., Indrayana, B., Syahruddin, S., Makadada, F. A., & Hakim, H. (2020). Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education context. Heliyon, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410
Surachman Arif. (2008). Analisis Penerimaan Sistem Informasi Perpustakaan (Sipus) Terpadu Versi 3 Di Lingkungan Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM). Perpustakaan Digital UIN Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 1(2).
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Published
2024-06-30
How to Cite
I Wayan Dian Anindya Bhaswara. (2024). PENGARUH KEMANFAATAN DAN KEMUDAHAN PENGGUNAAN TERHADAP PENERIMAAN SISTEM INFORMASI: BUKTI PADA SISTEM SAKTI. Journal of Social and Economics Research, 6(1), 487-501. https://doi.org/10.54783/jser.v6i1.438
Section
Articles
